</s>Mrs. Murriel M. Norque Page Three: May 29, 1971, (3) CASE NO. 2. (SCF A233421) (SCA) A232421) in this case Mr. Wolfer (3). CASE NO ., (3) and (4) (3). (3), (5) (4), (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21), (22) (23) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41) (50) (51) (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) (58) (59) (60) (61) (62) (63) (64) (65) (66) (67) (70) (71) (80) (81) (82) (83) (84) (85) (86) (87) (89) (90) (91) (92) (93) (94) (95) (96) (97) (98) (99) (100) (101) (110) (102) (103) (104) (105) (106) (107) (112) (108) (113) (115) (116) (117) (118) (119) (130) (120) (121) (122) (123) (134) (135) (136) (137) (138) (139) (140) (145) (150) (170) (151) (176) (171) (172) (173) (174) (175) (186) (187) (188) (189) (190) (191) (200) (205) (206) (207) (208) (209) (201) (202) (203) (204) (211) (212) (213) (214) (215) (225) (216) (227) (220) (230) (226) (217) (223) (229) (250) (260) (270) (240) (251) (255) (267) (265) (268) (269) (290) (286) (297) (298) (300) (303) (320) (350) (380) (310) (311) (321) (330) (340) (341) (345) (315) (366) (317) (318) (319) (420) (301) (302) (347) (404) (405) (406) (407) (408) (409) (411) (415) (416) (517) (520) (510) (530) (506) (505) (617) (508) (609) (2011) (2012) (2013) (2014) (2015) (2016) (2017) (2018) (2019) (2020) (2000) (2010) (2001) (2002) (2005) (2006) (2007) (2008) (2009) (2003) (2004) (January) (February) (July) (August) (august) (June) (March) (April) (May) (Jun) (September) (October) (November) (December) (June) (Jul) (Nov) (Mar) (No. 116602 Although the insertion of this envelope shows that gun

**Case No. A283421**

* **Exhibit S.5.5- ADM.N. EVIDENCE LOS AN CRID FEB 24 1969**: Evidence related to a crime investigation, including a firearm and ammunition.
* **LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPT. CRIME LAB TEST SHOT NAME.Sirbain 5.B. DATE 6-6-68**: Test results for a firearm, including a description of the gun and ammunition used.

**PUBLICATIONS BY CHARLES M. WILSON**

* "Observations in a Case Involving Powder Patterns and the FALLIBILITY of Eyewitnesses"
* "The American Journal Rallibility of Exterminations, Vol. 29, No. 4."
* "Two New Instruments for the Measurement of 'Class' Chartered by Fred D. D. M. Mccormick, The American Journal Criminal Law and CRITICAL JOURNAL, Volume 27, No .. No. 1, May-1,"
* "Principal editor, Scientific and Laboratory Methods of Judicial Proof Manual, University or Wisconsin Judicial proof manual, University of Wisconsin 1955, 1957, and 1959"
* "A System of Filling and Recording Firearms Case and in Memorandum to law enforcement personnel in Franklin County, Indiana, to investigate the American Academy in Wisconsin, In Memorandum of Memorandum, to memorize the American Rifleman, Distributed to members of the American Rifleman. Evidence for Prosecutive Attorneys (evo Vol. 3, Practicing Vol. 112, 12, and 12, 1965)"

**EXHIBIT "C"**

* **UNIVERSITE DE LAUSANNE INSTITUT DE POLICE SCIENTIFIQUE ET DE CRIMINOLOGIE**: Declaration by Anne de Jacques Katter, including information about her background and expertise in forensic science.
* **Any expert testimony which I tight give in a one involving firemen- tification would be based, at least at part, in the following six precepts which I consider inviolable.**

The document discusses the expertise of Lowell W. Bradford, a criminalist and firearms expert, who has provided testimony on various cases involving firearm identification. The document highlights six precepts that Bradford considers inviolable in his work as a firearms expert.

Precept 1 states that a positive identification of an evidence bullet can only be made if it is compared with a test bullet recovered from the same gun and not another. Precept 2 emphasizes the importance of using the actual evidence gun to determine the approximate distance between muzzle and victim based on powder pattern distribution.

The document also discusses the limitations of firearm identification, citing that land and groove dimensions can be identical or nearly identical between different firearms manufacturers. It notes that some shots fired from revolvers may travel for a distance along the barrel before taking up rotation due to the firing's twist.

Additionally, the document mentions Charles M. Wilson, another expert who has provided testimony on firearm identification cases. Wilson's affidavit discusses his examination of certain physical evidence in a case involving the fatal bullets of Kirk and Kirschek. He concludes that the single individual characteristic shown in Exhibit 100 is completely without merit in establishing a positive identification of the fatal bullet as having been fired by the same weapon.

The document also includes an answer to a complaint filed by plaintiff DeWayne Wulfer against defendant Barbara Warner Clehr, et al. The defendant denies each and every allegation contained in the complaint and alleges that certain statements made in a letter to the Civil Service Commission are absolutely privileged under the provisions of Section 47, Subdivision 2, Civil Code of California.

The document further discusses the First Amendment rights of the defendant, stating that the statements made in the letter were made in furtherance of her Constitutional right of redress of grievances. It also mentions that the publication and delivery of the letter to the Civil Service Commission constituted a petition to the government for a redress of grievances within the operation of the First Amendment.

The document concludes with an affidavit from Mrs. Murriel M. Norse, General Manager Personnel Department, Civil Service Commission, stating that she received a letter from defendant Barbara Warner Clehr on May 26th, 1971, which was sent without malice and was true in its contents.

**Key Individuals:**

* Mr. Wolfer: A key figure in the document, who is accused of committing perjury and violating precepts of firearms identification.
* Lenoxyn Snyder, Jack Cadman, Raymond Pinker, Charles M Wilson, Jacques Hester, Lowell W Bradford, R.F.C. Nichols: These individuals have submitted affidavits supporting the allegations against Mr. Wolfer.

**Dates and Locations:**

* October 24th, 1967: The date when Mr. Wolfer testified in a court case (People vs. Kirschoff) and introduced evidence that was later found to be false.
* May 26th, 1971: The date when the letter containing the allegations against Mr. Wolfer was written.

**Significant Events or Activities:**

* Mr. Wolfer's appointment as head of the Los Angeles Police Department's Crime Laboratory is mentioned in the document.
* The court case involving Mr. Wolfer and his alleged perjury is also discussed.

**Evidence, Testimony, or Findings Mentioned:**

* The document mentions that Mr. Wolfer presented false evidence in a court case (People vs. Kirschoff) and committed perjury by knowingly presenting false evidence.
* The affidavits of several individuals are attached to the document, supporting the allegations against Mr. Wolfer.

**Connections to JFK, the Assassination, or Related Investigations:**

* None mentioned in this document.

RFK Declassified Files

fbi_experience_rfk-2017_0108-box_001_folder_002-part_2_of_3.pdf

Document Summary

Try AI Search