</s>Will Sequester Jury Possession and said he did he did which even remotely-sug- Berman attained a national repu- After Judge Walker is the m-m-expect them to act as -d which even remotely sag- tation in 1956 when he defended after Judge Walker, the mf-mf-expedition to the de- tough it, and the pro-pro- messengers' for the de - existed. Keen against charges of the tors, who opposed to the man- information which they are- shouting in opposition when the tors. Who opposed to that did not have. positionsibilities indicating a- shouting of opportunity at the tors; who opposed the man - that information which were re- paris island, S.C ., Marine Base. the jury because it was. the jury became a "trust" did not not have, the jury was a "surveyer" that identified in other ways- tion included: Possibilities include: Paris Island, S C ., S ., Maritime Base. the jury walked an earlier. that was in the same way- that I-Man dress was- 74 young marines in a tidal march. that was convicted of negligent homicide. Sirhan walked a "fairly earlier. obtained, in other way- that I'm a dress dress and was convicted of illegal homicide. Judge Walker Walker was a by the defense. another than I-man accomplished of drinking out of duty. It was reduced of drinking on duty. The trial was selection of a jury of jury and by the defendant. Sihan an Ambassador to drink and impregnated for three of drinks on the trial. of the jury. If the jury is selected the court was in court, given in Parsons in statements, Sihhan and the Ambassador to state and impromptu for three of the court. of the Jury. The jury was selected given by them came from of them were fired, and to press accounts of a "colonel, as being a 'colo- would be a "c-o-o" would be swear at the time. <loc_542><loc_405>the jury. This court was 67 of them came to the court, <loc_559><loc_380>in the same court. The shot was fired, when they were fired. <loc_971> (The woman who told

Summary:  
The document details legal proceedings and administrative records related to the trial of Sirhan Sirhan for the assassination of Senator Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. It outlines motions to suppress evidence, challenges to jury selection, and procedural delays in the case, including postponements due to holidays or administrative rulings. The text references Judge Herbert Lange (later Judge Walker) overseeing the trial, FBI involvement in evidence submission, and disputes over search warrants for Sirhan’s personal items, such as a diary. Legal arguments included debates over sequestration of jurors, courtroom procedures, and potential delays. Media coverage of the trial and comparisons to other high-profile cases, such as James Earl Ray’s trial for assassinating Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., are noted. The document also mentions Sirhan’s pretrial isolation in custody and legal defense strategies.  

Key People:  
- Sirhan Sirhan (defendant in RFK assassination case)  
- Russell B. Parsons (defense attorney)  
- Judge Herbert Lange/Walker (assigned to the trial)  
- James Earl Ray (convicted for MLK assassination, referenced as a comparative case)  
- Michael McGowan (chief investigator referenced in legal proceedings)  
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (mentioned in fragmented context related to an "Arab Forum")  

Key Locations:  
- Los Angeles, California (trial location)  
- Paris Island, South Carolina (Marine Base mentioned in jury selection or evidence context)  
- Washington, D.C. (referenced in media and legal documents)  
- Shelby County Jail, Tennessee (James Earl Ray’s incarceration)  
- Birmingham, Alabama (linked to James Earl Ray’s trial and security measures)  

Key Events:  
- Trial postponements due to holidays and procedural motions (e.g., November 1, 1968 date)  
- Motion to suppress FBI evidence and disputes over search warrants for Sirhan’s diary  
- Jury sequestration debates and challenges to juror selection  
- Legal arguments regarding the death penalty and courtroom procedures  
- Media coverage of Sirhan’s pretrial activities, including his isolation in custody  
- James Earl Ray’s trial for Dr. King’s assassination (scheduled November 12, 1967)  
- Legal disputes over prison conditions and media access for both Sirhan and Ray  
- Sacramento bill restricting publication of RFK autopsy photos  

Key Organizations:  
- Los Angeles Superior Court (handling trial proceedings)  
- FBI (involved in evidence collection and suppression motions)  
- News outlets (*Los Angeles Times*, *Washington Post*) covering the case  
- Shelby County Jail (detaining James Earl Ray)  
- California Assembly (referenced in Sacramento bill restrictions)  
- U.S. Supreme Court (implied through judicial rulings on legal proceedings)

RFK Declassified Files

62-hq-587-a_sec_006_ser_sep_1_1968-jan_30_1969-part_3_of_3.pdf

Document Summary

Try AI Search