</s>555 No.Celle Marcus, m Springs, Calif. 92262. April 22,1969. Hon. John N.Mitchell, United States Attorney General, Washington,D.O. Dear Sir: I am enclosing another new item that aroseod our little neigh- borhood group called "Common Sense Sockers" to gather at my headcigs to disconse over a few beers.eto. The latest decision to gather in the United States to Supreme Court, a few beers.eto, interested in law enforcement of the United states JUSTICE, but in our studied opinion, these Street and wetts decisions has about reached the bottom. There have of course been other decisions during the last several years with respect to their philosophy and understanding of the Constit- tution that always appear to favor those who commit or crimes and forget the innocent victims or decisions that those who owe or prevent crimes We have also concluded that no matter what your department or Congress has also concluded no that matter when you have been department or mit-picking as laws to prevent these technicalities even though minute- as contrary to certain amendments to the Constitution that you adopted. over a century ago without appreciation or understanding of those honorable and respected foreforecasts or what is going on now. How could those men understand and realize the great progress and advancements and in our social, electronic, science, space, medical, education and field and in the world of necessary space. nation is in confronto with a reminder of what it is going or now. This latest reversal is shocking to an errege layman as it is a to as when they chose to rule on to omit this situation, it is make a crime to destroy the American Flag, but it is upstaged to the right of it. It is a defendant who deconounced the Flag and publicly set fire to it in June 1966, convicted but now reversed as it was published by the American Civil War. of the 1717 federal mantriff? Even though they upheld the constitutionality threw out by a federal law against threatening the life of the President's threatly threw out of the federal narrow vote to 5, that the Wages "threat" was mostly political hyper- bollet." (which means more or less than the truth ??? If such "threatened" or less then the truth ?? be drafted and added, if they ever make it carry a rifle, the first president I want to get in my sights or if they were able to make it, while LBJ was a rifle. Our president, I than yelling and in my sight is LBJ, but I did not make it while I was even though very. dangerous and final results not known. dangerous if the final result not know. If the above reasoning by our highest court through the usage <loc_878><loc_917><loc_917>of such fancied law law as well as political hyperbole, probably coined by <loc_913>of liberal thinking law clerk, then Sirhan Sirhan used "political hyperbole" <loc_950><loc_950>and he later managed to complete his political hatred by murdering Senator

Summary  
The document contains a mix of legal correspondence, court proceedings transcripts, and administrative records dated between April 17-22, 1969, primarily focused on Sirhan Sirhan’s trial for the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. Legal debates center on habeas corpus petitions, Miranda rights violations, evidentiary standards, and capital punishment eligibility. References include Supreme Court justices (e.g., Raymond T. Tobiner, Stanley Mosk) and procedural issues such as confessions and judicial reversals of lower court rulings. Unrelated content includes a play script, letters to political figures like Richard Nixon, and administrative records about civil rights divisions and immunization programs. Some sections reference unrelated cases, such as James Meredith’s 1967 shooting in Mississippi, and broader discussions on U.S.-Middle East relations. Redacted SSN placeholders (e.g., [SSN REDACTED]) are noted in the text.  

Key People  
- **Sirhan Sirhan**: Convicted for RFK’s assassination; central to legal debates over capital punishment, mental health defenses, and extradition to Jordan.  
- **Robert F. Kennedy**: Victim of the 1968 assassination; subject of trial and subsequent appeals.  
- **Justice Raymond T. Tobiner, Stanley Mosk, and others**: Supreme Court justices referenced in legal arguments and procedural discussions.  
- **John N. Mitchell**: U.S. Attorney General (1968–1972), mentioned in letters regarding legal and political decisions.  
- **Richard Nixon**: President of the United States; recipient of letters criticizing judicial leniency toward Sirhan Sirhan.  
- **Verla J. Cravens**: Letter writer expressing frustration with judicial delays and perceived leniency in Sirhan’s case.  

Key Locations  
- **Los Angeles, California**: Site of RFK’s assassination and Sirhan Sirhan’s trial.  
- **Washington, D.C.**: Headquarters of the U.S. Department of Justice and Supreme Court.  
- **Jordan**: Discussed as a potential extradition destination for Sirhan Sirhan.  
- **San Francisco, California**: Mentioned in context of legal proceedings or administrative records.  
- **Palm Springs, California**; **Watertown, New York**; **San Diego, California**: Locations referenced in unrelated content (e.g., play scripts, letters).  

Key Events  
- **RFK Assassination (April 4, 1968)**: Central to Sirhan Sirhan’s trial and subsequent legal debates.  
- **Sirhan Sirhan Trial**: Legal arguments over capital punishment, mental health defenses, and judicial reversals of lower court decisions.  
- **Habeas Corpus Proceedings**: Discussions on procedural issues such as confessions and evidentiary standards.  
- **Extradition Considerations**: Letters questioning U.S. Justice Department’s potential deal to send Sirhan Sirhan to Jordan.  
- **Flag Desecration Laws**: References to Supreme Court rulings (e.g., *Texas v. Johnson*) in debates over free speech and judicial activism.  
- **Letters to Political Figures**: Criticisms of judicial leniency, delays, and perceived political influence on legal outcomes.  

Key Organizations  
- **U.S. Department of Justice**: Central to discussions about extradition, legal policies, and judicial oversight.  
- **Supreme Court of the United States**: Addressed in debates over free speech, flag desecration, and judicial reversals of lower court rulings.  
- **Civil Rights Division (U.S. Attorney General’s office)**: Mentioned in administrative records and legal proceedings.  
- **California Department of Corrections**: Referenced in context of prison facilities or sentencing considerations.

RFK Declassified Files

166-12c-1_section_6-part_2_of_4.pdf

Document Summary

Try AI Search